435 Hamilton Street  
Allentown, Pa. 18101  
Allentown  
Minutes - Final  
City Council  
Wednesday, September 3, 2025  
Invocation:  
6:30 PM  
Council Chambers  
Pledge to the Flag  
Roll Call  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated Ms. Affa was here.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that she is here.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that she is here.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that Ms. Mota is on here way. She should be  
down in the garage right now.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated ok, Mr. Hanlon. We will begin with Courtesy of  
the Floor.  
7 -  
Present:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Courtesy of the Floor  
Please observe the Rules of Council when given privilege of the floor. A copy of the  
Council Rules can be found on the council agenda on the website. If you would like  
to speak, we are asking that you fill out a card – they are on the back table provide  
them to the clerk before speaking. Include your name and address. When speakers  
have the privilege of the floor, personal insults, attacks, name calling or other  
behavior that is inconsistent with the purpose of conducting official business will not  
be tolerated.  
Courtesy of the Floor is meant to provide public comments on items that are not on  
the agenda. Public comment during consideration of ordinances, resolutions and  
motions are limited by topic – your comments must be relevant to the subject matter  
of the proposed legislation. Public comments are taken before  
legislation.  
council votes on  
You are given the privilege of the floor to provide public comment; it is not a  
question and answer session. State your position clearly and concisely for  
consideration. If you speak on behalf of yourself, you have three minutes and if you  
are speaking on behalf of a group that has several members present, you will be  
given five minutes in place of everyone coming to the podium. Please address the  
Council President not individual councilpersons or city staff. Refrain from insulting  
or defaming staff, officials, and the public; refrain from  
using offensive language,  
cursing, and making noises while other people are speaking. Please be aware that  
comments and/or behavior in violation of these rules will result in a forfeiture of all  
remaining time and you will be asked to return to your seat.  
Ms. Kristina Schware, Allentown - PA, stated good evening and stated that  
she was here before back in June or July. She just wanted to reiterate  
some issues that she has been brought up. She stated that she would like  
to bring to light a problem with rental properties and use zoning  
interpretation. The current zoning interpretation of the zoning ordinance is  
that a rental house can have four renters on a lease and each of these four  
individuals can bring along any family members/friends to live in said  
house. The original ordinance was interpreted to allow only four and non  
related adults in the house similar to the Muhlenberg College campus  
neighborhood. She stated so here is her demo and the old interpretation  
of a rental house with four people. Here is the new interpretation of the  
same and how many people need housing. She stated that she actually  
have two houses in her neighborhood that have blue or blond, and red  
person on the lease. She stated that we went from this to this. She stated  
that she wants to reiterate the important facts that this is not a zoning  
ordinance change. This is strictly an interpretation change, it does not  
need any kind of zoning ordinance change to go back to the way it was for  
enforcing. She asked do you want a city with this many people in a house  
or do you want to support the neighborhoods that are already there and  
already stable. She stated that she has two single family houses in her  
neighborhood that were bought by outside investors. One has 14 to 17  
people living in it, including children. They are all different t families.  
Besides the parking issues which is seven plus cars for a said house.  
This house has renters that have opening been terrorizing and accosting  
our neighbors. She stated that she is currently, personally witnessed two  
confrontations to confrontations. She has witnessed, one of the neighbors  
yelling about how she is going to f*ck up all of their cars in the block. She  
has seen smoking outside all day at this property. She has also seen rock  
throwing and screaming fro m said house. She said she has another  
house next to her. They have a ton of people in it. Luckily, on this house on  
itself is pleasant stating that we have a friendly relationship with them. They  
don't speak any English, but they communicate and she gives them Fair  
tickets stating that they have a good relationship, but it doesn't exempt the  
fact that there are 0 to 12 people nonrelated living in said house. The  
problem is, it is not so much as a tenant issue as much as it is a landlord  
issue. She stated that are pulling one over on this city. They can have 10  
plus people in a house with no more taxes then a landlord who has one  
tenant. The landlord can get anywhere from six or seven thousand dollars a  
month. The city gets nothing. The residents get all the burden of said  
houses. The school districts get all the burden from said houses because  
there are kids living with strange unvetted, and no background check adults  
in a very stable neighborhood. I t is not so stable anymore. Besides, the  
two houses that are currently turned into these on the third on its way. She  
stated that she has talked to Council. She has talked to Zoning. She has  
been to Planning. She stated that she has talked to Police. She has talked  
about issues. She has talked to Engineering about issues. She stated that  
nobody has addressed any of these issues. She stated that Mike Hanzo  
asked her once she stated her concerns about what is going on in her  
neighborhood. She stated that he asked her why do you stay there and she  
was like, well, because everything that she has said to you can be fixed if  
people do their jobs. If the zoning rules were meant and enforced in a way  
it used to be enforce. If the Police actually came to the calls that they have  
expressed, she heard people crying in the middle of the night at 1:00 AM  
at these houses to the point where she thought that they were being  
attacked. She stated that she just want to reiterate that this isn't so much  
about all the people who have been living in the houses, but how the  
landlords are coming in from other areas and abusing the people who live  
in the house by charging exorbitant rates and our neighbors are just isn't  
and this is the point where she would even go out of her neighborhood and  
look up the street at said house because she has neighbors that look up at  
that house and one of the people in the house come out and accosted them  
and said why you looking at my house or just people living here. She  
stated that she has children and doesn't want them exposed to that.  
Please fix this misinterpretation zoning because ultimately it is hurting all of  
our neighbors. Thank you.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that's it.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that is the only one.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated yep.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Ms. Schware. He stated that he will see that  
someone contacts you, ma'am.  
Ms. Kristina Schware stated to be honest she has talked the ear off of  
numerous people and ultimately it falls on the administration and their  
interpretation of what is being allowed or not being allowed.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that we will look into it. He stated moving on to  
Contract Approvals.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated Point of Order, it looks like it might be another  
member of the public. She stated that she just doesn't want them to get off  
the agenda, and then they would say oh.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated oh, ok.  
Mr. ? Allen stated that let her speak now without doing that now stating that  
it is her Constitutional Right. It will save time with the rules.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated come up, fill it out and give it to Mr. Hanlon. He  
stated state your name.  
Mr. Allen  
Ms. Peggy and Ed Ramposh and stated that they have a concern because  
the city is being blamed for the school district telling them that they can't pull  
in front of like Raub School to just drop our child off at school after a  
doctor's appointment. She stated that they have adopted four children that  
have medical needs. She stated that they are there at the school at lot,  
dropping off, picking up, taking the doctor's appointment. Take them to  
psychiatry appointments so on and so forth. She stated three weeks at the  
end of last year, the school Raub told us, they were coming out and  
harassing them about waiting in front of the school in a no parking zone.  
She stated for him to run in and sign out their daughter for five minutes max  
and when they are dropping off after the appointment they just let them out  
and make sure they get into the school safely and they were getting  
harassed. They were sending to school officer out to harass us and then  
they were telling them last year to park on the people's property in the ally  
and then the parking authority came by and gave that parent a ticket. They  
were giving them directions of where we should park, but they were illegal  
parking as well as pulling over along in front of the school with our four ways  
on long enough for our child to go into the school or run in and grab our  
child out for an appointment. Now, if they were going for a meeting, they  
would walk around and find a parking because they were in there longer for  
like an hour. She stated that she is talking five minutes, two minutes to find  
there are some facts with parking in front of the school. Now, the school is  
saying you guys are putting a stop to the parents parking in a no parking  
zone to run into the school to grab our kids for an appointment out of the  
school. It is like picking her daughter's friend out of the home, putting on  
her four ways if there is no parking. Watch the child go into the home to  
make sure the child got in there safely and then leave. It is as simple as  
can be.  
Mr. Ed Ramposh stated that pretty much what they are asking them is it  
possible to have a parking spot allocated in front of the school during  
school hours to pick up children.  
Ms. Peggy Ramposh stated that it is a 10 minute parking sign that allows  
parents to go into the school and grab their child for an appointment and  
whatever. If they have a longer appointment like an hour long meeting for  
IEP or whatever, then they need to find the parking wherever they need to  
park. She stated that the Raub School put up a sign out in front. It was a  
makeshift last year. She stated that it was a rude sign. In the beginning, so  
she called downtown and let them know that she does not appreciate their  
sign. It's rude and now this year, they have it street cleaning, no parking.  
She sign stated that they are not even there two minutes to five minutes  
max. However long it takes for them to sign their child at the curb or in the  
middle of the street.  
Contract Approvals  
R114  
Authorization for Contract with Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. in the  
estimated amount of $50,000.00 per year to provide technical assistance  
services to support the preparation and submission of grant applications  
under various Federal, State, and Local programs. These services will be  
used on an as-needed basis to support the City’s efforts to secure funding  
for multimodal, safety, and infrastructure improvement projects. Five (5)  
proposals were received. Contract shall be for three (3) years with two (2)  
additional one (1) year renewal terms beyond the contract expiration  
period.  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Attachments: R114 - Bowman  
Ms. Sarrah McNeil stated good evening. This was done as RFP2025-30  
Traffic Grant Assistance. It was advertised on Public Purchase on June 26,  
2025. There is a Public Bid opening on July 2025. The city received five  
proposals. An evaluation team consisting of four members conducted both  
technical and cost evaluations. The proposals were evaluated based on  
IBE preference: qualifications, experience, preferences and costs. After  
evaluating the proposals, the evaluation committee decided not to move  
forward with oral presentations. The committee is recommending an  
award to the top scoring firm, Bowman Consulting Group.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Ms. McNeil. He asked does he have any  
questions or comments from his colleagues.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated Mr. President, we have been applying for grants for  
how many years now. He stated for years, decades, right. He asked why  
now all of a sudden do we need to pay somebody to advise us how to  
prepare a grant.  
Mr. Mark Shahda stated quite a few years. Unfortunately when you get into  
the technical aspect of applying for these grants for the technical  
assistance which with federal and state grants requires cost estimates and  
concept plans. Fortunately, that scope of work is a little bit beyond our  
skillset of what we can do in-house. We have to rely on our consultant for  
assistance. He is not saying that one day they can't get there, it is just  
unfortunately right now the way our current staffing levels are, our skillset  
and scope of work is just a little beyond our skillset.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked is that because of the technical requirements  
within these grants.  
Mr. Mark Shahda stated that it is a technical requirement. The cost  
estimates are actually designed with conceptual plans. They just don't have  
anybody in the house right now that can put all that together for them.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Shahda and asked anybody else. He  
asked if there were any comments from the public.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Enactment No: 31106  
R115  
Authorization for Contract with Cougle's Recycling, Inc. in the estimated  
amount of $1,773,750.00 for the acceptance, processing and marketing,  
and related services for the City’s recyclable materials. Four (4) proposals  
were received. The initial term of this Contract shall be for a five (5) year  
period beginning on the commencement date, January 1, 2026, and  
terminating December 31, 2030. At the sole and absolute discretion of the  
City, this contract may be renewed for two (2) additional two (2) year  
periods.  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Attachments: R115 - Cougles  
Ms. Sarrah McNeill stated that this was done as RFP2025-17, recyclables  
acceptance for processing and marketing related services. It was  
advertised on Public Purchase on May 23, 2025. There was a public bid  
opening on July 9, 2025. The city received four proposals. The evaluation  
team consisting of five members conducted both technical and cost  
evaluations. The proposals were evaluated based on the IBE preference  
history and qualifications, the ability to meet the RFP requirements and  
costs. After evaluated the proposals, the evaluation committee decided  
not to go forward with oral presentations. The committee is recommending  
an award to the top two scoring firms, Cougles Recycling Inc for this  
Resolution for the processing of this single stream curbside recycling and  
Newman and Company Inc for their next Resolution which is R116 for  
Paper Fiber Material Confidential Shredding Cardboard.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Ms. McNeil. He asked if there were any  
questions or comments from the dais or any comments from the public.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Enactment No: 31107  
R116  
Authorization for Contract with Newman & Company, Inc. in the estimated  
amount of $445,000.00 in Revenue for the acceptance, processing and  
marketing, and related services for the City’s recyclable materials. Four (4)  
proposals were received. The initial term of this Contract shall be for a five  
(5) year period beginning on the commencement date, January 1, 2026,  
and terminating December 31, 2030. At the sole and absolute discretion of  
the City, this contract may be renewed for two (2) additional two (2) year  
periods.  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Attachments: R116 - Newman  
Ms. Sarrah McNeil stated that was the same information that she provided  
to all R115.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated the same thing, ok. He said Mr. Zucal.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked why are we paying two people to do this.  
Ms. Sarrah McNeil stated that we are not. Cougles, we are paying for the  
recycles and Newman, we are actually receiving money.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated if you look at the wording, they both say the same thing.  
The acceptance processing and marketing.  
Ms. Sarrah McNeil stated yes, they were done as one solicitation.  
Newman only bid on the revenue portion. Cougles bid on all of it, but  
Cougles wasn't providing and they were actually going to make less money  
going with Cougles. Newman's is revenue generating and Cougles is that  
the city is paying them for the process of the recycling.  
Recycling personnel stated that Cougles is for our single stream or  
curbside. Some of the recyclable materials and drop off down at the drop  
off center. He stated Newman is paper only for the Drop Off Center. It is  
two separate contracts. One is for single stream processing that we hall  
directly to presently Birds Borough, down at Total Recycle and then  
Newman Paper is our current vendor for our paper and our cardboard in  
the present state right now.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked where does the paper and cardboard go. You said  
Bird Borough for the other one. Where are the other ones?  
Recycling Employee stated that Newman is in Philadelphia. That's where  
they take it presently as well. They are the current vendor.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated ok. Alright, thank you.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated ok, anybody else from the dais or any  
comments from the public.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Enactment No: 31108  
Enactment No: 31108  
R117  
Authorization of Cooperative Contract(s) in an amount greater than  
$40,000.00 to provide the City with various goods/services, for Horwith  
Trucks, Inc, Condition One Commercial Roofing, LLC, Dell Marketing LP,  
B&H Photo Video Inc, and Miller Flooring Co.  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Attachments: R117 - Coop  
Ms. Sarrah McNeil stated that these are all items being purchased through  
various Cooperative Contracts.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanks Ms. McNeil. He asked if there were any  
questions or comments from his colleagues. He asked if there are any  
comments from the public.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Enactment No: 31109  
R118  
Authorization for Contract with BankFunding, LLC. in the amount of  
$622,860.95. To finance one (1) Seagrave Marauder Pumper for five (5)  
years. Two (2) proposals were received; however, one (1) proposal was  
rejected.  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Ms. Sarrah McNeil stated that this was done as Bid #2025-34 Pumper  
Truck Financing. It was advertised on Public Purchase on July 18, 2025.  
The Public Opening was held on August 7, 2025. The city received two  
bids. One proposal was rejected to them not signing their signature page.  
After the department reviewed the proposal, they are recommending the  
award to the sole responsive bidder BankFunding, LLC.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Ms. McNeil and asked if there were any  
questions or comments from the dais. He stated he has a question and  
asked is that to lease the truck or purchase it.  
Ms. Sarrah McNeil stated that the way it works is they actually have money  
to do a down payment. They will receive the truck this year and will start  
making lease payments to BankFunding, LLC come 2026 stating that we  
will receive the truck this year.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Ms. McNeil. He asked any comments from  
the public.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Enactment No: 31110  
Enactment No: 31110  
Minutes of Previous Meeting  
15-7942 August 6, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Communications  
Note: Tomorrow, September 4th, at 11 AM in Council Chambers we will hold a press  
event with Duane Morris LLP to address findings and recommendations pursuant to  
Ordinance 16094 passed in January of this year.  
Parking Chasers – We encourage you to park in the lot next to City Hall, the City  
Clerk will provide you with a voucher.  
Old Business  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that she just wants to see if anyone from the  
administration had any updates in terms of the Motion that they made on  
August 13. That within 30 days that they would find a solution for folks to be  
relocated to. Those that were unsheltered. Why Maximum has 80 beds  
and there are more than 80 people down there. There are going to be  
more people becoming unsheltered. She stated that she is wondering if  
the administration have any update. She stated that she knows in the  
paper, the mayor says that he is not abiding by the Motion, but maybe just a  
little smidge of and he guesses he wants 60 days. Even though they  
unanimously said 30, but he wants 60. Is it even a smidge, a bullet point, a  
something of an update like.  
Mr. Mark Shahda stated that he doesn't have any information this evening  
to share with you.  
Ms Ce Ce Gerlach stated oh my goodness. That's worrisome. Thank you  
so much.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that they will actually pass it along to the  
administration.  
Mr. Mark Shahda stated that he will share it with the mayor.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that it is literally life and death, man. We never  
agree on anything and here we unanimously agreed on something and just  
to be disrespected and this be like, oh I will just take my own time. She  
stated that is challenging. She sees that as very challenging that is being  
done.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated let's try to get that answer.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that it is not for sure. It is not just the encampment. As  
Mr. Shahda and he can tell them there is someone living here right now  
under the cement slab. He saw it and stated that I see it.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that she means.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated living on the slab outside the window.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated yeah and even if we just the email about West  
Park. It is going to get worse. She met a lady the other day and she got  
$10 to feed herself, her two teenage sons and her rent is still due. It is  
going to get worse stating we got to figure something out and we can't just  
keep pushing and pushing with Feasibility Studies and this and that. She  
stated let's do something. You got to do something and we share that  
urgency. She stated that we collectively did that. The administration just  
got to reciprocate that. She stated that it's got to happen.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked you Ms. Gerlach.  
REPORTS  
Budget and Finance: Chair Napoli, Santos, Gerlach  
The Committee met this evening; the next meeting is scheduled for  
September 17th at 6 PM to review the monthly finances.  
Community and Economic Development, Chair Mota, Hendricks, Napoli  
The Committee has not met since the last council meeting; the next  
meeting is scheduled for September 10th at 6 PM - the items for  
discussion include Incentives for the landlord engagement program,  
workforce unit goals, city Investment in workforce units, options for the deed  
transfer tax and the development of an Affordable Housing ‘Fund’ - some of  
these discussion points are connected.  
Human Resources, Administration and Appointments: Chair Santos,  
Napoli, Hendricks  
The Committee has not met since the last council meeting; there are no  
future meetings scheduled.  
Parks and Recreation: Chair Gerlach, Santos, Affa  
The Committee has not met since the last council meeting; there are no  
future meetings scheduled.  
Public Safety: Chair Affa, Zucal, Mota  
The Committee has not met since the last council meeting; there are no  
future meetings scheduled.  
Public Works: Chair Zucal, Gerlach, Affa  
The Committee met this evening; there is one item on the agenda  
regarding the 537 Adoption Plan which is the Plan basically that deals with  
the water and sewer construction increases in the future.  
Rules, Chambers, Intergovernmental Relations, and Strategy: Chair  
Hendricks, Mota, Napoli  
The Committee has not met since the last council meeting; there are no  
future meetings scheduled at this time.  
Controller’s Report  
The Controller has submitted three reports which are on the city website.  
He stated as they know they had interns this summer and did three projects  
and he is going to point out to the first one this evening. The others will  
follow with subsequent meetings. He is going to report on the audit  
findings of the Sweep Audit. Basically, the procedure for this was the  
developing a flow chart of their operations and that you already seen at a  
prior meeting. They used the process flow chart narrative to identify  
potential risks and develop appropriate testing of the risk areas. Then  
they selected a sample of ticket payment information, tracing it back to the  
database and daily sentiment reports to assess the accuracy of those  
payments. They selected a sample of Sweep tickets and supporting  
documentations to verify the timeliness of the ticket process and its  
compliance with the ordinance. They reviewed the fines imposed verifying  
the fees with the ordinance and finally, through discussion and observation  
of the initial complaint, payment collection and deposit process identifying  
any potential internal control or weaknesses. There are basically four  
findings. Three of them are similar and one is different. He stated that they  
noted that the Accounts Receivable for Sweep Tickets because not  
everybody pays for their ticket in a timely manner and certainly not  
everybody pays their ticket at all. The accounts receivable is kept separate  
from the city's Munis System. This liability that is sitting out there or  
uncollected money is off on Sweeps own database. It has not yet been  
integrated into the city. If you may recall, this is very similar to what we  
found in EMS last year, except the number was a lot larger and they had $8  
or $9 Million sitting off in Accounts Receivable that was not integrated into  
the city's financial picture. He stated earlier today, we had a Report on the  
city's audit. He stated now, these numbers aren't small, but at some point it  
is conceivable. They can have an affect on the city's audit, if they are not  
brought back in. They should be really for best and accurate reporting. The  
administration acknowledges the importance, but doesn't feel that they  
have the manpower to integrate this is at the moment. They have one  
person dealing with Accounts Receivable and they will review it and  
monitor it and the department with support and guidance as needed from  
the Finance Department on recommendations to integrate it to be clear the  
administration doesn't feel they have the resources to do that at this time.  
The second finding they note is progressive find weakness. For the first  
and second offenses and violations of this chapter within an equivalent  
period. Violation tickets should be issued in the amounts of $25 or $100  
dollars for the third offensive violation of this chapter over the 12 month  
period. Violation tickets should be issued in the amounts of $150 or $250  
for the fourth offense of a violation within a 12 month period, violation  
tickets should be issued in the amounts of $300 and $500. For 2024, we  
tested 13 addresses and pull a sample and don't look at everything. He  
stated that they can't look at everything. They pulled a sample of tickets.  
They looked at 13 addresses which should have been assessed  
progressive fines. The total dollar amount for the 13 unpaid Sweep Tickets  
tested was $4,238.95. None of the unpaid Sweep Tickets had progressive  
fines assessed. He stated that this is contrary to the Ordinance. The  
recommendation is that either we need to comply with the Ordinance or  
they need to go back and reevaluate the ordinance and change it. He  
stated real simple. The second thing, is an appeal process weakness.  
People weren't appealing in a quick enough time. Once again, it is  
contrary to the ordinance. The recommendation is the same. He stated  
that they are not following the ordinance. He stated that either they  
changed the ordinance or change their practice to comply with the  
ordinance. The fourth finding, has to do with payment process weakness.  
If a person received $25,000 violation ticket and doesn't pay the fine or  
request a hearing within 10 days. The person will be subjected by a $10  
penalty for days 11 through 20. If a person is in receipt of a $100 violation  
ticket, and does not pay the fine or request a hearing within 10 days. The  
person will be subjected to a $25 penalty for days 11 through 20. In 2024,  
they tested 20 random $25 tickets and 20 random, $100 Sweep Tickets  
that was paid in full that was not assessed a late fee to determine when  
they were paid and if they were following the Ordinance noted that 13 was  
paid within 14 days or less. Six were paid greater than 14 days or less  
than 30 days. One was paid greater than 30 days. For $100 Sweep  
Tickets, 12 was paid in 14 days or less, eight were paid between 14 and  
30 days and there were no tickets under 30 days. Although ordinances,  
require payment within 10 days, currently Recycling and Solid Waste allows  
14 days to pay the Sweep Ticket in full before assessing the fine. Once  
again, the finding is the recommendation is the same. Either change the  
ordinance to recognize the practice or make sure the practice complies  
with the ordinance. He stated that they did not go back and look five, six or  
seven years ago. He stated that he is pretty sure that this practice is  
longstanding prior to this administration and probably through a number of  
administrations. Interestingly enough, they audited Sweep in 2014 and  
2015. Some of these findings are the same. So really, it ought to be a  
wake up call for Council, the administration to address the issues, change  
the ordinance and make it have some bearing in reality. It is a great tool for  
the city to have for our neighborhoods to get rid of some of the qualities of  
life stuff, but if we are not following the ordinance, you know it certainly  
becomes much less effective. He stated that he would be happy to answer  
any questions.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Glazier and asked does he have any  
questions.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that you actually hit the nail on the head when you said  
the quality of life issue.  
Mr. Jeffrey stated that it is a great ordinance.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated unless you are going to enforce the tickets, there is no  
need to change the ordinance. There is no need to have six Sweep  
Officers. There is no need to have the police waste time issuing Sweep  
Tickets, if they are not going to get collected. He asked Mr. Glazier to his  
best recollection, what is the total amount that is outstanding now.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated that the total amount outstanding now sir, is in  
2025, there are 1550 tickets with outstanding just shy of $135,000. From  
2022 to 2024, there are 9,411 tickets outstanding for a total of $1,158,000.  
In 2016 to 2021, $8,880 tickets for an outstanding of just over $1 million  
and pre 2016, 9,000 tickets for $1.2 million. He stated clearly, some of  
these need to be written off.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that he agrees, but he is saying why are we wasting  
manpower, police manpower to issue these tickets. Who is actually  
responsible for collecting the fines in the city.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated that he would say that the Sweep people are in  
coordination with the administration and he thinks Mr. Zucal raises an  
excellent question.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated if he gets a Sweep ticket today and you said yourself,  
there were several instances where they didn't increase the fines. That he  
gets the ticket today for $25 and he decided that he is not paying it, screw  
it. Because no one is coming after me anyway. He stated that they just  
wasted paper, just wasted the manpower. Changing the ordinance is not  
going to do anything. If you are not collecting the fees and you got a state  
citation and you didn't pay stating obviously a Sweep Ticket is a lot  
different than a state citation. If you got a state citation and you pay, you will  
end up at some point getting your license suspended, your registration  
suspended, and he understands that it is different, but it is really not  
different. This is issued from the city of Allentown. An official sweep officer  
or a police officer and it is not getting collected. There is absolutely and  
they talk about how they are in debt and having money problems in the city.  
This is a terrible example to bring forward. He stated to Mr. Glazier stated  
he is doing his job and appreciates that he did a great job on this, but we  
need to look in the mirror here because if they are not going to do the job  
then there is no reason to have this ordinance.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated to Mr. Zucal that he raises some interesting  
points. There are a couple of things and Mr. Shahda and Mr. Stout can  
certainly comment. They are not dealing with criminal citations. They are  
dealing with civil citations so he doesn't know how much of a stick there is  
there. There are some things and if city departments collaborate where  
ordinances can be changed which he thinks will increase their leverage to  
get payment or proper payment as to the debt of city services and it goes  
into an enterprise fund and really not going to have an effect on the general  
fund. If they are fine in doing the work than they should certainly, people  
should certainly pay.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that the most important thing out of this whole thing is  
the quality of life stating that if he is calling on a neighbor four times for loud  
music and he gets four sweep tickets, and he doesn't pay them he stated  
that he just wasted his time and the police officer's time. He stated that  
something has to change here that's for sure.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated once again, he thins Mr. Shahda and Mr. Stout  
could certainly add something.  
Ms. Candida Affa stated that she knows she had an encounter with Mr.  
Shahda several times on the eastside with Sweep Tickets. They were  
issued immediately and in one incident she thinks they went to the  
magistrate and the people on the eastside in Washington Street, they were  
eviction. These were renters though. She stated that she saw the city and  
the administration in action doing what they supposed to do. There were  
two incidents. One on Jasper and one on the eastside and then when she  
went back to speak with Mr. Shahda, he stated that they have been taken  
tot he magistrate and she knows the one person paid both the tickets. The  
second one, they were evicted. She supposes it goes on and on and on.  
The experience that she had with the city was something that she guesses  
that this is the process because of the magistrate, Mr. Shahda, right.  
Mr. Mark Shahda stated that is correct. He stated that he would allow Mr.  
Stout to elaborate a little further, but would like to provide a little bit of  
comments. He stated that Number 1 he would like to start off by thanking  
Mr. Glazier for this in-depth audit. He stated that unfortunately he is not in a  
position to really speak on how things were managed in the past. He  
stated that obviously Mr. Glazier's recommendations are going to be taken  
under consideration. They are already working on making those  
improvements. It is going to take a little bit of time to get there. It is a  
learning curve for our staff. He stated that he would allow Mr. Stout to  
elaborate further and talk about how with his experience how this process  
has been managed.  
Mr. Brett Stout stated that he has been with Recycling since 2019 and he  
was name the Sweep and Animal Control Manager back in November  
2021. There were thousands of outstanding sweep violation tickets at that  
time. He stated that if they look at their revenues over the last five years  
with Recycling, they have been pretty significantly because they were very  
quick to respond to when an appeal comes in or continuously ticket and/or  
take individuals to the magistrate for when there are outstanding sweep  
violation tickets. He stated that he is not saying that their process is perfect  
where they are obtaining all of the outstanding fines, but every single time  
they take a landlord or property owner into magisterial level, they are  
bringing all those sweep violation tickets in order to try to obtain restitution  
for those violation tickets that are outstanding. He stated that their process  
has become a lot more mainstream for sweep officers to really try to make  
an impact on those problem properties that we have in our neighborhoods  
and they will continue to do so. They opened up their doors to Mr. Glazier's  
interns and provided our process flow and try to make things better within  
our department.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated that he would agree with Mr. Stout. They were  
essentially cooperative. The intern had a great time and loved going  
around and made it to court, but this presents a great opportunity for the  
city and for sweep. Now that the process has been looked at again to  
make some qualitative improvements that would yield better quality of life  
for our city residents and hopefully greater compliance and maybe a little  
more revenue. He stated that is the spirit in which this is offered and as he  
said earlier, he thinks it is really a collaborative effort between the  
administration, the various departments whether it will be Solid Waste,  
Building Standards, Health, Rental Department, and Council to really come  
up with some positive changes and store them into practice. He hopes that  
everyone would be happy with those results. He stated that this is a good  
starting place for you.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Glazier and asked anybody else at the  
dais.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated bouncing off a couple of things that was said  
today, you did the audit or could a future audit look at what Mr. Zucal was  
saying like the time that it cost to issue a sweep ticket in a monetized way  
and the actual printing of the product. The gas to drive out. She stated  
everything. She asked could that be looked at and then compare that to  
the amount of payments that are actually being made because if they are  
spending more money to issue the tickets, but not recouping at least the  
same amount, it does seem a little off.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated that you have the expense information every year.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated like in a package.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated that in your budget, you can certainly plot it  
against revenue.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that she guesses that if you are saying we  
should do something with an ordinance, before she would want to do  
something with an ordinance, she would want to know if how much does it  
cost to issue a Sweep Ticket.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated fair enough. He just cautioned her that if  
everything they did had to make money or break even, they would do  
nothing stating that we will close our pools, we wouldn't have police, we  
wouldn't run sports leagues.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that she hears him, but this is about money  
because you said we're we could be getting more revenue.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that we could and it would once again would go  
into the Enterprise Fund. It would go into the Enterprise Fund.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that money would go into the Enterprise Fund.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated correct and there might be any number of  
programs.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that she doesn't want to argue, she just throwing  
it out there and stated thank you.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated that the question is fair and if Council is  
interested in pursuing that he certainly will work with Bureau and with  
Finance to help develop a number.  
Mr. Santo Napoli stated a couple quick things just so that everyone  
understands, what he learned over the years is the goal is compliance,  
right. If someone gets a Sweep Ticket, if they have 10 days to remedy  
situations and if they do so, it is a violation and asked is it rescinded.  
Mr. Brett Stout stated that a appeal needs to be placed in order for them to  
go out there and recheck the property for compliance, but he hit the nail in  
the head. He stated that we are not just seeking revenue, this is not a  
revenue generating program, this is a compliance program. He stated that  
they are seeking compliance for all residents in the city. He stated that we  
have to utilize the enforcement and the ability to find someone with that  
violation cost, if they are not being compliant.  
Mr. Santo Napoli stated that he just wants to make sure that he  
understands that. He asked Mr. Glazier are there any patterns or anything  
you saw when you looked at the data. He asked did you see any patterns  
when you looked at any frequent flyers or something that stuck out.  
Mr. Jeffrey Glazier stated that his understanding and the work paper does  
show some frequent flyers and this is where he thinks collaboration  
between different city departments come into play. Is how to work with the  
property owners that fall into that category to help them better compliance  
as he mentioned, working with Solid Waste and Building Standards and  
Health. It is only through collaboration and working with a frequent flyers  
that you are going to get people to follow the Rules.  
Mr. Santo Napoli stated where he thinks he is going is, if there are folks  
that are getting multiple tickets, the only avenue to collect if they don't pay is  
a magistrate. He asked is that what he is hearing. We have to take them  
to the magistrate.  
Mr. Brett Stout stated that they filed with the local magistrate and it will take  
about four to six weeks for them to obtain a court date and that is if they  
respond to that certified letter, but there are time where they won't sign for it  
so it just sits in ether and then the city has to ask for a bench warrant and  
again, it could just sit, sit and sit until we get some kind of response.  
Mr. Santo Napoli stated that he thinks one of the things they can look at if it  
has to be an ordinance, but if we collaborating as Mr. Glazier said with  
different departments, they may be able to tie some of our licensing to  
these Sweep Tickets. For instance when someone wants to renew their  
business license in 2026, the Sweep Tickets that are outstanding must be  
paid first and if someone wants to renew their rental registration, those  
Sweep Tickets need to be paid. He stated that Mr. Glazier may have  
eluded to this is to look at that opportunity because when he thinks of a  
magistrate, it is time, it is costly and people going and sitting there for three  
hours. They are backed up. He stated that he rather tie it to licenses and  
say, hey, listen if you want to renew this, you got to clean up those invoices.  
He stated that he is not sure if it is an option or not. He stated that he is not  
sure what the legal parts of it are, but it might offer your department a little  
bit more teeth and more opportunity to collect some of these, especially on  
and not looking to go after someone that gets one Sweep Ticket every 12  
years. He stated that is not his intent. He thinks it is more the folks that is  
getting many how aren't compliant and understand what their obligations  
are with multiple properties. They are just not paying enough. He stated  
those are the folks that he kind of thinking of right now.  
Mr. Brett Stout stated that in certain circumstances, they can look into it.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked anybody else on the dais. He asked if there  
were any comments from the public, please step up.  
Mr. Dan Blount stated he was previously a Pastor for Ripple, but  
nevertheless, he is listening to you guys and saying what is the proactive  
way of handling this. He stated that you say it is not about money stating he  
doesn't know nothing that it is not about money. He stated he doesn't  
know. He stated that if he is wrong, then let him know. Nevertheless, what  
is the proactive way of getting these people to understand that it is a  
necessity for them to pay those fines or what have you. How can we get  
them to get there. How can we get to that point.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that those are the things that we have to  
explore, may be by committee. Again, collaboration. If somebody gets 15  
tickets, it's alright if you get one. You correct your behavior. You get 15,  
you are just thumbing your nose and saying I'm not correcting my behavior.  
I am going to continue to do what I been doing. Those are the things we  
have to look at.  
Mr. Dan Blount stated for him, he thinks a town hall meeting with all the folks  
who have the problem of not being able to pay or just being stubborn and  
not paying is to have a town hall meeting, let them know the process and if  
you don't pay, then we have a problem. He stated that would be a good  
start. He stated that he is not sure.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that he believes that was in the letter that they  
received from the city. He asked is that correct.  
Mr. Brett Stout stated that when you receive a Sweep Violation ticket, it  
states what the ordinance is and also provided pictures and evidence of  
why you are receiving a Sweep Violation ticket. It can also provide you  
with directions with how you can appeal that ticket and when they submit an  
appeal, the city goes out and check for compliance. Whether or not they  
corrected that violation at that point in time. He stated that they can  
withdraw the ticket in full or modify it to a lesser amount before they can  
community with them stating, hey, we are working on it and we can see  
that, but this is what you need to do in order to complete that. He stated  
God Bless you all and have a great day.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Blount.  
Mr. Dan Blount stated that is understandable, but his thing is, if we are face  
to face, it is a better understanding more so than a letter. Because most  
people take letters and rip them up. Nevertheless, he thinks a town hall  
meeting would be the process or the most proper thing to do for us to really  
get an understanding and how to get it straight. He stated that is just his  
thought stating God Bless you all and have a great day.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Blount.  
Dr. Cynthia Mota stated that she has a question and if they happen to know  
if when you issue those tickets, are there like landlords or tenants. She  
stated that she knows that in this city there is a lot of people that own  
homes and they live elsewhere. She stated that is not an excuse, but she  
was just wondering.  
Mr. Brett Stout stated that all tickets are issued directly to the property  
owner based on their registry through Lehigh County. If their mailing  
address is out of state, it is issued to that property that is out of stated. It is  
pulling from JS data from Lehigh County.  
Dr. Cynthia Mota thanked Mr. Stout.  
Ms. Candida Affa stated Rev. Blount I would like to address what you said  
about the money. The reason why they are talking about it, this is all quality  
of life. The reason for these Sweep Tickets are because your property is  
kept really nice. If there is someone next to you weeds are growing and  
dog crap all over the place and things like that. This is what the Sweep  
Ticket is and we are talking about not about the money. Of course, we  
want our money. As you can see, we are not collecting it. It is the quality of  
life that we are really upset about. Isn't it up to the magistrates to have them  
arrested or does it get clogged. She stated there, we do our job and you  
issue them and it goes to the magistrate and ask does it die there. She  
asked is that what happens.  
Mr. Brett Stout stated sometimes it can. He stated that we had some  
difficulty from last year with the courts and we get in there and we don't feel  
as though the fine that they are upholding is high enough on their end. If  
they get to the magistrate level. The minimum is $100 and the maximum is  
$1,000 per violation. It is the judge's discretion stating they could have  
spent hours upon hours upon hours at the property there and the judge only  
rules it in favor of $100. Where we have been going in there and we have  
been asking for that maximum fine restitution for old (inaudible).  
Mr. Dan Blount stated once again, the town hall meeting you are talking  
about is if we were all to get together (inaudible) doing their part as far as  
picking up their properties because it is important for everybody to keep  
their properties. He stated nevertheless what he is saying to them is they  
will have a property meeting and says how can he help them out. Just  
come over and help me cut my grass.  
Ms. Candida Affa stated that you really think these people are going to  
come to that town hall meeting. The people that aren't paying their tickets.  
Mr. Dan Blount stated that he doesn't know that. You don't know that, but  
what we are saying is, it is a beginning. He stated that is all he is saying.  
Ms. Candida Affa stated thank you.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated ok, moving on. He state that the mayor has not  
submitted anything this evening.  
Mayor:  
The mayor has not submitted anything for the agenda.  
Controller's Reports  
Attachments: Check Review.pdf  
ORDINANCES FOR FINAL PASSAGE (To be Voted On):  
CONSENT AGENDA  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that you have two items for the Consent Agenda  
There are two Certificates and Appropriateness that approve the pulling of  
permits in the Historic Districts. He stated that R19 is at 428 N 6th Street  
and R20 is at 28 N 1th Street.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked if there were any questions or comments from  
the dais.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
R119  
Certificate of Appropriateness for work in the Historic Districts: 428 N 6th  
St.  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Enactment No: 31111  
R120  
Certificate of Appropriateness for work in the Historic Districts: 28 N 15th  
St.  
System  
Sponsors:  
Enactment No: 31112  
RESOLUTIONS FOR FINAL PASSAGE (To be Voted On):  
R113  
Resolution Adopting the Updates to the Regional Act 537 Plan,  
Lehigh County, which includes the City of Allentown,  
and its Submission to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental  
Protection  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked if there were any questions or comments from  
my colleagues.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that it was in his committee and it was sent favorably.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Zucal. He asked if there were any  
comments from the public or his colleagues.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Enactment No: 31113  
R121  
Approves the following transfers: Information Systems - $85,000; Traffic  
Planning and Control - $22,000; Council - $472,023,45; Parks and  
Recreation - $40,000  
Administration  
Sponsors:  
Attachments: R121 Transfers  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Hanlon and stated that this was in.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked what is the $427,000 for Council.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he can speak to that if Mr. Zucal wants. He  
stated that it is for the payment to pay Duane Morris. It is for the payment  
for the Controller's salary and the payment for your salaries.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Hanlon and stated that this was in.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked what is the $427,000 for Council.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he can speak to that if Mr. Zucal wants. He  
stated that it is for the payment to pay Duane Morris. It is for the payment  
for the Controller's salary and the payment for your salaries.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Hanlon and stated that this was in.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked what is the $427,000 for Council.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he can speak to that if Mr. Zucal wants. He  
stated that it is for the payment to pay Duane Morris. It is for the payment  
for the Controller's salary and the payment for your salaries.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Mr. Hanlon and stated that this was in.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked what is the $427,000 for Council.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he can speak to that if Mr. Zucal wants. He  
stated that it is for the payment to pay Duane Morris. It is for the payment  
for the Controller's salary and the payment for your salaries.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked what is the separation of the amounts.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated pardon.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked what is the separation of the individual amounts.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he is going to have to look at the Transfers.  
He stated that the Transfer itself (inaudible).  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that it is Transfers so he is sure there are some of  
these Controller salaries are already been covered somewhere.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that they were about to run negative balances.  
This will cover the negative balances for the Controller and your salaries.  
He stated that this will cover the Law Department who was paying for  
Duane Morris and they were about to run into negative balances. This is  
where you took money from your Account 46 and provided it to them. The  
other (inaudible) put money permanently into the FICA Account. The big  
transfer was the transfer to all departments.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked and how much was that.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated $376,776.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated $376,776. He stated that there is a hundred grand for  
the Controller Account, Council, and the other part of the Law Department.  
He stated ok, thank you.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked if there were any other questions.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach asked are they going to have to transfer again stating  
because they are going to have to still pay Duane Morris because they are  
doing that Press Conference tomorrow. They are going to need to get paid  
for that. Is this the last time we have to pay these folks.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that he believes it is the final and stated that he  
doesn't have that information.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated he is not sure about that, but Maria can answer  
that.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach asked where is that money going to come from since  
we all are going negative now.  
Attorney Maria Montero stated so far what has been distributed and  
approved for payment is a bill that includes March, April, May, June and  
July. There has not been a receipt for August's bill yet, nor September.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated ok. She asked do we have an idea where those  
funds might come from. She asked do they have to do more transfers.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated it can't come from your account. There is no  
money really left. That is a Bina question and thinks she would have to deal  
with that when the city gets the bill. He stated that Council drained their 46  
Account down to $60,000. He stated that he is not sure if Council is going  
to have to pay another bill for the audit. He stated, but you are correct. You  
will have to deal with whatever that bill is.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach thanked Mr. Hanlon.  
Ms. Candida Affa (inaudible).  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated no.  
Ms. Candida Affa asked if Council could give them $50,000.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated $50,000 to them, why and then $8,000 for tents.  
She stated that we are not going to be able to give them their money then.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he believes that the $25,000 was already  
taken from the account.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated so $25,000. Yes, $25,000. She stated so the  
$25,000 the Y is going to get. Now, when everyone is made to pack up  
and go, we said we want to give them money to get new tents. The  
Conference of Churches and remembers Ms. Affa saying specifically the  
Conference of Churches. She stated that they need to get their money.  
What do we need to do t make sure that they get their money for new tents.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that you would have to transfer something out of  
the 46 Account or whatever account and flip it into Materials and Supplies.  
An account for that would be appropriately.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated asked who needs to initiate that Council or Ms.  
Patel.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that you would need to initiate it.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated so we need to initiate that, ok. Thank you.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that would appear as if it would appear now.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated gotcha. She stated that she would like to go on  
record that is to be done the next meeting.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated ok.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked if there were any comments from the public.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated you got to come up.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that you got to come up to the.  
Pastor Dan Blount stated it baffles him as to give a 30 days extension, right  
and asked is that what they gave. He asked what are they doing after that  
30 days. He stated somebody help me please. He stated that we are  
talking about human lives. He stated that they are not talking about  
animals. They are talking about human lives. He asked what do we do  
after that 30 days.  
Ms. Candida Affa asked if they are going to the Y.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that is not what he is asking. It is what she  
recommends on what she asked the mayor to do.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that you came in a little bit after we had said this.  
She stated under Old Business, she had said about if you read some of the  
articles, the administration is saying that they want 60 days. She stated  
they, but they as a Council had given the administration 30 days because  
of what you said. This is life and death. She stated that they asked for an  
update from the administration. They did not provide one to Mr. Shahda so  
there is no update or even a sketch of an update. As of now, where will  
they go. They will go to your backyard. They will go to Hamilton Street.  
They will go to West Park.  
Pastor Dan Blount stated that they can't hang in his backyard.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that the question was asked and he doesn't  
believe you were here at the time.  
Pastor Dan Blount stated that he understands that and it is very important  
that we do something with those people and he knows some of them rather  
be out there and a lot of them want to be in place where they are warm  
during the winter. What do we do about that. How can we raise money.  
He stated that you got Hyman and he is building all these buildings and all  
these other people with money building all these buildings for their own fair  
game. He stated that is bullcrap to him. He stated that what he is saying is  
that why can't they build a building for the homeless and figure out a way of  
them reimbursing them, but the reality is that this is malarkey as the one  
coach said. It just doesn't make sense to him. He stated how can we keep  
allowing the people who stay on the street and then if they stay on the  
street, at least you know where they are. It is just so many things that can  
be tackled here and he doesn't think they have a huddle with the right  
people in it. He stated he is sorry, but God Bless you anyway.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks thanked Pastor Blount.  
7 -  
Yes:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Enactment No: 31114  
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION (To be referred to Committee with public  
comment prior to referral):  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that there are no ordinances for introduction and  
no resolutions  
RESOLUTIONS FOR INTRODUCTION (Can be voted on or Referred to Committee):  
NEW BUSINESS: NONE  
GOOD AND WELFARE  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that we have one more Transfer.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked if there was anything for Good and Welfare.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that Mr. Felton handed in a card and wanted to  
speak. He stated that Mr. Felton probably remembers when Courtesy of  
the Floor was at the end a long time ago.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated that they will allow him to speak. He stated  
please come up, Mr. Felton.  
Mr. Walter Felton stated Honorable City Council and the reason why he is  
here is because last week he turned on his television and they had an  
individual here in Council Chambers claiming that they were the secretary  
of the local Chapter of Lehigh County. He stated that he wants to explain  
something to you. He stated that he is the president and they are  
regrouping and putting together, but the person who was here and it is  
around the whole nation. The national and want happened with the letters.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks asked Mr. Felton to explain.  
Mr. Walter Felton stated that he would explain and stated that they had a  
letter that was written saying with the main letterhead with all of the  
executive members on the NAACP a while back. He stated that they had  
one lady that came up here and said that she was the president and Ms.  
Barbara Redmond. He stated that it is national. It is not like it has to be  
anything. It is on the national website. He stated that incident went all the  
way up to the national board of the NAACP. They had called a meeting  
with their legal firm, with the chairman, the CEO, the president, and the  
National Counsel. This is not the state. They took it right from the state and  
took it to national. The reason is that the person comes here stating he  
doesn't think that she is misleading them. Maybe she forgot she is not the  
secretary, but two weeks ago on Channel 69, they identified her as our  
secretary. He stated for your information, she was suspended by the  
national board for six years and in order for her to come back, she has to  
take retraining and on top of that she has to get voted in, even though she  
is a life member. He stated that he just wanted to bring it to your attention  
so if she happens to be up here maybe someone can remind her. She is  
not the secretary anymore. She was removed for six years and it is an 85  
year old organization and they help everybody and he just wants to put it on  
the record that she is not and if you want to see it, it happened on February  
15, 2025 at the Marriott Marquee in Manhattan. The whole national from  
the whole country was there. They removed her because two things and he  
doesn't want to get any further, but she removed the president which was  
under his name from the bank account and second, she tried to keep him  
out of the organization when he was elected. He stated that he has known  
her forever and has nothing bad to say about it. He wants Council to know  
if she comes in the Chambers, she is no longer affiliated with the NAACP  
in any way or form. He stated that they have procedures and protocol  
stating obviously national thought it wasn't an option for the state to do it  
and they took it in their own hands and removed her for six years. He stated  
thank you very much.  
Ms. Candida Affa stated that there was some confusion and asked Mr.  
Felton are you the president now.  
Mr. Walter Felton stated that he is the president now.  
Ms. Candida Affa thanked Mr. Felton and asked him has he been.  
Mr. Walter Felton stated that they are rebuilding. They are rebuilding. He  
stated that she was refusing to give the vice president of national a list of all  
the people that's in membership. She kept it so they are back one by one  
knocking on doors bringing people back. He stated that they are an 85  
year old organization. Thank you.  
Mr. Daryl Hendricks stated to Mr. Felton, thank you very much and stated  
with that, we will be adjourned.  
ADJOURNED: 7:38 PM  
Reference Materials:  
Council Rules  
Procurement Code  
Ethics Code  
Attachments: Procurement Code