435 Hamilton Street  
Allentown, Pa. 18101  
Allentown  
Minutes - Final  
City Council  
Wednesday, May 1, 2024  
6:00 PM  
Council Chambers  
Roll Call  
7 -  
Present:  
Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Natalie Santos, Ce-Ce Gerlach, Candida  
Affa, and Santo Napoli  
Bill 40  
Fine Increases  
Hendricks and Napoli  
Sponsors:  
Ms. Cynthia Mota stated that the sponsors are Mr. Hendricks and Mr.  
Napoli.  
Mr. Santo Napoli stated that he will speak. He stated that he is a board  
member and would like to at least give the lay of the land on why they are  
here and they will continue the conversation. He stated for those that don't  
know him, he does sit on the Allentown Parking Authority Board. He was  
appointed by Mayor O'Connell as a merchant. Obviously, he became a  
City Council person later. He stated that he does serve in that capacity as  
well. The Parking Authority Board two meetings ago raised monthly  
contract parking in its downtown decks along with the transient hour rates in  
the decks. He stated that the surface decks were increased by $5 per  
hour. Unfortunately, this wasn't enough to overcome budget shortfalls that  
continue to be predicated on low revenue due to the parking ticket violation  
rates being too low. The violation rates were implemented in 1985 and  
updated in 2001. That was the last time and since then no updates have  
been made other than double parking. That is the only one that has been  
updated. Right now, they are dealing with a significant imbalance when  
compared to deck and street rates. The Parking Authority are in charge of  
the affective administration of parking in our city. Parkers are always  
encouraged to use parking decks and street parking should be for transient  
parking only. Obviously, folks that are coming to restaurants, coming to a  
small business, they want those spaces to be open so they can come and  
go and they want folks to spend the day to do it in the deck. Currently, the  
parking penalties n the Central Business District even for safety violations  
range from $10 to $15. What is happening here, folks are choosing to take  
a ticket as opposed to parking in the deck because it would actually cost  
them less money to get that ticket on the street. He stated that is the  
reason they are here tonight. It is a imbalance. It doesn't make sense.  
This also leads to a lack of parking for visitors and customers which also  
results in double parking which they all know it is a continue issue  
throughout our city. It saves visitors money. He used concerts as an  
example. To come downtown and park for a concert is $15 in the parking  
deck. They can park in front of the restaurant for six hours and get a $10  
ticket. It is not helping that restaurant. That customer that wants to come  
eat at that restaurant, now either has to park farther away or they have to  
pay the parking deck which is $15 which is unfair because they are only  
going to be there for an hour and a half. The streets are designed for  
transient parking. Long-term parking needs to go in the deck. The  
violation rates aren't helping to accomplish that goal. Over the time, the cot  
of doing business has also increased dramatically at the Parking Authority.  
Back in 2001, when they updated the violation rates, the hourly labor was  
$9 an hour. That is what they were paying their hourly folks. Today, the  
starting rate is $21 an hour, with options for benefits. This is important  
because first off it is a livable wage. They want to make sure that the folks  
working in any organization or business is paid a livable wage. Secondly,  
if the Parking Authority would pay less hypothetically, what would happen  
just like any business, it would result in more turnover. The problem with  
turnover in any business is that you have less experience, you have  
inconsistency and much more mistakes which is not an option when  
dealing with writing tickets. The goal of the Parking Authority board is to  
have employees be there long-term, well experienced, and that results in  
less mistakes for the public. Labor continues to be the primary shortfall on  
the budget. If mistakes are made from time to time, the board instituted an  
internal appeals process back in April 2023. Anyone with a ticket can  
appeal their violation internally, instead of taking it to the magistrate. What  
was happening before April 2023, folks had to appeal their tickets at the  
district court. The problem with that is the ticket incremental increased and  
they had added court fees. It is really doing a disservice to the public.  
Having an internal appeals process is free and since its inception, the  
Parking Authority is averaging close to 50 percent dismissed or reduce to  
warnings. So it does work. The board also started a program for  
inspection/registration violations which gives 15 days. If you have an  
inspection that is out of inspection or our of registration, you have 15 days  
to remedy and the ticket is rescinded. The AP board has discussed  
initiatives which will benefit residents. He stated that this is important. A  
Community Relations Specialist was hired in January. His job is to  
improve communication and collaboration with the community and  
stakeholders. He attends neighborhood groups meetings and visits with  
stakeholders, etc. There is much more communication going between the  
Parking Authority and the community then there was a year ago.  
Unfortunately, there are initiatives that are on hold due to the budget  
shortfalls. He wanted to make sure he mentions these quickly: in the last  
seven or eight months, they have been discussing internally an internal  
payment plan which is really important to us. To his knowledge, most  
Parking Authorities don't offer this service, Philadelphia does. The  
difference in Philadelphia is they are a city and county. They can do it  
much more efficiently. In Allentown, we are separate from the county and it  
becomes much more difficult. The Parking Authority has gone to their  
software vendor to assist in upgrading their software that communicates  
with the state and district courts. The estimate for this upgrade is between  
$35,000 - $50,000 and something that they are working on. This will also  
help violations from reaching district courts where the amount increases  
and fees are added. It is very important for someone to have the ability  
hypothetically if they got a violation for $50. Instead of having to pay the  
$50 within 10 days, they have the option to pay $12.50 a week for four  
weeks. They don't have to may a decision on what not to buy in one week.  
They can spread it out and that is really important why they are working on  
it. Also, investments in requiring and converting blighted parcels in our  
densest neighborhoods to add parking capacity. This was done at  
Seventh and Allen Streets. If you are familiar with the surface lot on that  
corner and it was successful. It was actually successful in reducing tickets  
in that neighborhood. The concept works. They would like to replicate it  
over and over in our densest neighborhoods. Again, it is on hold due to  
budget shortfalls. If possible, they would like to do a small business  
discounts. Some sort of programs for part-time employees working  
downtown who parks in the decks. They have a lot of people that work in  
restaurants that work hourly rate jobs that they would love to help with their  
parking downtown, if that was an option. Lastly, further investment in larger  
projects which has the affect of increasing development and therefore,  
increasing the tax base for the benefit for all citizens of Allentown. For  
instance, when the Parking Authority built a parking deck, it attracts a ton of  
development in that area. It benefits everyone with the tax base increasing  
it. Lastly, if the Parking Authority continues to have budget shortfalls,  
misses its covenant with the bank, there is a risk that the bank could sell its  
assets to the private sector. It has happened elsewhere. Most recently, it  
has happened in Harrisburg and it resulted in street parking going up to  
$4.00 an hour. In Allentown, it is $2.00 an hour and monthly contracts for  
their parking decks are between $200 and $275 a month. He stated that  
the city's is currently at $100 a month. So when the private sector gets  
involved, there's a definite difference in the rates and the community will  
feel that. He is not a Harrisburg guy, but he is an Allentown guy and  
focused on Allentown, but if he was guess, he guessing that businesses  
are leaving Harrisburg because of this. That is something that he does not  
want to see in his city. It is important to note that it can be avoided. They  
have done the research. They have done other measures first and they are  
here tonight because they continue to have the shortfall and the other  
measures they made in the parking deck with the transient and monthly. It  
is just not enough. That is why they are here tonight to discuss.  
Ms. Cynthia Mota thanked Mr. Napoli and asked if there was anybody else  
from the dais.  
Ms. Candida Affa thanked Ms. Mota and stated that her thoughts on this  
and thought about it a lot. She used to be on the Parking Authority and she  
understands the process and understands all these things. When she  
thinks about this, she thinks about the merchants and it has to be people to  
come into the city to open their businesses who are asking people to come  
in as consumers. When they think of the deterrent when they raise prices  
or fines or whatever. In this case, it is a detergent that they can sit all day  
long in front of Mr. Napoli's business or a restaurant and just have to pay  
$10. The other consumers if they want to go to a restaurant and they want  
to go to the game, they can find no parking. They are a city of 130,000  
people. Harrisburg only has 50,000 people. She stated that we consider  
ourselves the third largest city because of population and when we have  
this population, they have a lot of parking problems. She knows and it is  
documented that Philadelphia lawyers will come into our federal building  
and into Allentown and the Parking Authority can attest to this and get $10  
and all day long they are sitting and parking on our streets from  
Philadelphia and it is easy for them. It is only $10 for the entire day. It has  
become a joke. When she thinks about bringing fines up, she doesn't think  
of it as a deterrent. She thinks of it as it is going to help the merchants,  
help the city of Allentown, and when Mr. Napoli brought up the point that the  
Parking Authority could go belly up and stated we are in serious trouble. It  
is not a threat that they are $1.8 million in debt now and for someone to  
actually be able to come to our city and park all day long for $10. Raising  
this amount, could help the Parking Authority get out of the $1.8 million.  
The reason they are in debt is because we had 24/7 service and we no  
longer have that. They are no longer giving those tickets out. They paid a  
lot of money for new cars and officers. She stated to her she thinks this is  
so necessary that you are actually helping the merchants by upping the fine.  
It is so much easier now with our meters and everything. You don't have to  
run out and put any money in it. If you are in a restaurant and it is running  
out, you can use your phone. There is no reason for you to sit there all day  
long. The only reason you are doing it is because it is only going to cost  
you $10. She thinks to help consumers and to help our merchants, she truly  
believes in having to find larger than $10 would be an advantage.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that she thinks most of her questions might be  
best answered by the Parking Authority. She stated that one of the  
questions she had asked back when they met on Zoom is other  
municipalities are referenced that they fines for violations are higher. The  
question she had asked back then and she will ask now is, is it working. If  
other municipalities are charging more, do they have less safety violations,  
less parking violations then what we have.  
Mr. Jonathon Haney from the Allentown Parking Authority stated that he  
reached around and asked all his colleagues and asked if somebody had  
studies from other cities beyond Pennsylvania that would back up or at  
least give any data to that claim. He could not find any and being 100  
percent truthful with everyone. He spoke in depth with Lancaster Parking  
Authority who has in the past gone through the same process where they  
raised parking fines and compliance increased minimally. It wasn't a  
watershed moment where suddenly everyone realized everything going on  
and began parking legally. Certainly, that is the goal. He doesn't want to  
write more tickets. He wants to write less tickets. He would rather see  
people comply. Hopefully, that gives you some kind of answer. He doesn't  
have any material data to give her. It just isn't anything out there that he can  
find.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that she definitely appreciates your honesty. A  
lot of times people would just try to paint a glossy picture. She stated that  
she appreciates his honesty. That is one of the main concerns she has.  
They have no evidence that increasing fines actually would work, why do it.  
Her understanding of the Parking Authority, she remembers it was about  
2015 or so before she got on here and she remembers that Mr. Zucal had  
said hey, you guys just want to make more money and then the Parking  
Authority said no, no, no we are not about that. They are about public  
safety and making sure that people have spaces. She stated that she  
thinks it is kind of two approaches, clearly you are a business. You need to  
make money. There is also the idea of providing quality services and  
increasing public safety and if that is also one of the main purposes of a  
Parking Authority and there is no evidence that increasing fines would  
increase public safety. That is an issue. She stated that her second issue  
or question is that a couple of months ago sent an email out about meter  
placement and she said it here publicly. There are meters were they  
shouldn't be. These are meters that people may not feed and therefore  
have to pay a ticket. These are meters because they are meters, there  
will be parking attendants going out to those blocks and more likely to get  
tickets for other types of things. She stated that they are talking about  
outside the Health Department. If you are going to the Health Department  
for health, you are poor. You don't have money more than likely. Yet, there  
are meters there. There are meters on blocks that are purely residential  
blocks. There is no commercial. They are on the block, but yet there are  
meters. Many of those blocks are restricted and they can't even get the  
residential parking permit for their block. They have to feed the meter.  
There is a federally qualified health center on the 100 block of Hamilton  
Street affiliated with Casa Guadalupe. Federally qualified health center,  
again, poor with meters outside. She stated to her, until that issue is fixed  
she doesn't think in good conscious they can raise the rates on poor  
people.  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated that he didn't want to interrupt. Just as a  
response to a couple of issues you brought up. He wants to borrow from a  
comment that was made at an earlier committee meeting from our Public  
Works Executive, Director Mr. Shahda. As he was explaining his position  
to this Council, he made mention that his departments are grappling with  
dealing with the growth of a city such as Allentown. Experiencing rapid  
growth and creating challenges for his department. He stated that Ms.  
Gerlach kind of hit on this point. The Parking Authority is no different. Their  
costs have increased and certainly they need to be responsible of what  
they are in charge of and make sure that the proper revenues are coming in  
to cover those costs. Beyond that, those revenues also serve them to meet  
those needs in the neighborhood that she is talking about. He can tell her  
that they recently at their most recent board meeting collaborated with the  
city and looking to acquire a piece of property. This is in a very densely  
populated area and happens to be in an area that they have numerous  
surface lots to service the neighborhoods at that location. They are all  
packed full and every one of those lots have a waiting list for people trying  
to get on that lot. The city was very gracious in working with us and helping  
them put this deal forward and get their ability to acquire this piece of land.  
He has no funds to develop it. Those revenues come from in part, the  
enforcement of the parking fines that they are mandated with doing. The  
Parking Authority is limited to three sources of revenue that they can draw  
from. That is per state legislation that created that so they can charge for  
their decks and lots. They can charge for the meters on the street and the  
revenue comes from enforcement as well. He stated that Mr. Napoli  
mentioned before that the Parking Authority Board has taken a hard look at  
those options and they exercised what they can in some of those, but it is  
not enough to make up that gap so they can do some things like develop  
land and/or work on a Meter Parking Study which he has and would like to  
speak to Ms. Gerlach at some point after this. Get eyes on that and see  
what they can do to move forward on that. It ties back to his first comment.  
Allentown is a very growing metropolitan area. They experienced a lot of  
growth and development and as some things in the Public Works  
Department needs to change to meet with that. He agrees with them. It is  
high time they do a meter study and consider where those meters are  
allocated. That is actually a Council function. Council determines where  
metered blocks go and the Parking Authority puts the meters in and  
enforcing them. It is another opportunity to collaborate with the city and  
take a hard look at those things and see now that Allentown has changed  
and grown so much. He stated that he has been here for eight years with  
the Parking Authority and there are blocks that are 100 percent different  
than when he started as far as the development goes. Without this fine  
increase, it is going to leave them in a position where they don't have the  
revenues necessary to meet those increasing costs as Mr. Napoli  
mentioned in wages for our workers. Along with that, it is just not the hourly  
wages, it is the health insurance increases. The very same issues that  
Council deals with the folks that work for the city. You guys are dealing with  
the same issues we are. Your electric bill goes up, our goes up. The  
health insurance goes up, so does theirs. The only difference is when it  
comes to the fine increases, those haven't been adjusted in 23 years.  
Imagine working for 23 years and never getting a raise. How would you  
deal with your cost of living increase? How would you deal with buying  
food, paying your rent, taking care of every day living things without an  
adjustment to that. This proposal that he put forward before this Council to  
consider takes all those things into account and without it, it is going to be  
very difficult for the Parking Authority to meet their needs and to be able to  
continue to develop parking, look at things like meter studies and other  
items.  
Mr. Santo Napoli asked Mr. Haney if he could quickly address about the  
issues with the meters on the 100 block of Hamilton and why the meters  
are there and what would happen if they weren't there.  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated again, he is not trying to throw things  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated again, he is not trying to throw things around  
here, but the meters are there because Council designated it as a meter  
block. He stated that is the plain and simple answer to it. He thinks taking  
a look at a meter study and bringing in a qualified consultant to take a look  
at those things and evaluate the different aspects that go into why should  
this be a metered block and why should it not be. What is the purpose of a  
metered block? Mainly, to create turnover and service businesses. He  
stated that he knows where Ce Ce is coming from because her block  
where they are talking about is at one time may be a little more  
commercial. Right now, not so much. It is more residential. There are  
many places in the city that are like that. He stated that again, she would  
have his support in working with the City Council or a committee to  
consider a study. Maybe go in together and look at that and put it together  
and get someone in with some good suggestions on how they can change  
those and meet today's needs and not be dealing with meter installations  
that were put in decades ago.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach thanked Mr. Haney asked stated that he has mentioned  
the residential lots. They were $30 a month. How much are they now?  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated that the board voted to increase them by $5.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that now they are $35. She stated that the  
Parking Authority recently acquired the PPL garage. If you are broke, why  
did you guys do that?  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated correct. He stated the 940 Linden Street. He  
stated that they are in the business of providing parking. As Mr. Napoli  
mentioned, they are trying to service all needs of the city. Obviously, they  
have a lot of development going on downtown. There is a lot of building  
going on and when the opportunity presented itself for them to acquire that  
deck, he stated that he is going to borrow from our neighbors in Bethlehem.  
They have been in the paper recently. The Bethlehem Parking Authority is  
looking in constructing a brand new parking deck with 520 something  
spaces he believes and the cost to build that deck is $45,000 per space.  
That is almost two-fold increase on what it was just a few years ago. The  
deck that they acquired was a strategic move and know there is  
development going on in that area. The Parking Authority would not be in  
any position to construct a deck to meet the needs that are going on there.  
And, being that it was an existing structure with some life on it, the price for  
it and he believes they paid $10,000 a space to acquire that deck. It was  
an opportunity that they couldn't pass up. They would not be able to keep  
up and meet the needs of the development in that area of town as it is  
expanding westward on Hamilton Street by constructing another deck.  
They just finished the Maple Street deck. So to build another one wouldn't  
be possible. It was an opportunity that they had to take. That acquisition  
had no impact on the 2023 budget and it won't have an impact on the 2024  
budget because there is revenue coming from PPL until November. The  
acquisition of that deck did nothing to the budget. If anything, it improved it  
this year.  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated that there was an existing lease agreement  
there that provides funds that cover the payments for the decks.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that her last question and thanked Mr. Haney for  
answering all of those. It would be more so for the administration. There  
was a conversation when all the hoopla was happening in 2023, the  
administration was going to study to see what it would look like if we as a  
city ended up taking over the Parking Authority. She asked Mr. Haney has  
he and the administration talked about that. Has the administration given  
any updates on that. She stated just in case something were to happen.  
He stated that he has none presently that he can share on that.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that Ms. Ortega is coming up.  
Ms. Genesis Ortega stated that they do have a report ready on the Parking  
Authority Study. They are hoping to share that within the next couple of  
weeks. She stated that they can have Ms. Gerlach take a look at it. They  
do have something.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach stated that is great to know and that might be helpful  
before voting on something like this.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that he has a question about that because he recalls  
that the money that Council gave to the city to help with this investigation  
never occurred and it was put back and gave back to Council. He asked if  
that is correct Mr. Hanlon.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he does not know.  
Ms. Genesis Ortega stated that they did the study.  
Mr. Ed Zucal asked on her own, you did it without Council's money.  
Ms. Genesis Ortega stated that it was Council approved the study.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated he knows Council approved, then they gave money and  
then it never went anywhere. He recalls the money being brought back.  
Mr. Michael Hanlon stated that he thought it was questionable whether the  
study was done.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that he believes at the time he asked the question, it  
had not been done. It could have been done since.  
Ms. Bina Patel stated that the funds that Council had approved were used  
for this study. They have finalized the study and will share with them. She  
stated that they did use the funds that you had approved.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that he basically had the same question Ce Ce had  
because a couple of weeks ago they were talking about buying the old  
police station. Again, if you are in debt why would you be creating more  
debt.  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated that he doesn't believe the Parking Authority is  
going to be doing that.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that he believes that was the talk.  
Mr. Santo Napoli stated that was never the talk. The Parking Authority is  
cooperating with the city and bundling both parcels together to get them  
back on the tax rolls. The Parking Authority is handling the RFP. They  
were never purchasing a police station and what they are actually doing is  
the first $1.5 million of the sale goes to the city. They are actually doing the  
city a solid.  
Mr. Ed Zucal stated that he can't discuss the meeting, obviously because it  
is confidential. They had a major discussion here of that being sold to the  
Parking Authority. The mayor came up here and made his statement on  
why that should not be done. He asked what is the city's position on raising  
these rates. He doesn't believe that the mayor is here, unless Ms. Ortega  
has a comment. He asked if they are in support of it.  
Ms. Genesis Ortega stated that she does not have a comment.  
Ms. Cynthia Mota stated that she is not against the raising of the fees  
because she knows that it hasn't been raised for 20 something years. She  
knows that the Parking Authority needs revenue because you guys are in  
debt. What she is against is who they are trying to target. She is afraid  
that they might try to use this as a weaponizing against the community and  
that is what she is concerned about. She stated as they know, the  
community is poor. What would be the target and what is the plan.  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated that there is no target per se other than the city  
of Allentown. The Parking Authority's mandate is to enforce the parking  
regulations citywide. They go anywhere and everywhere in town from the  
eastside to the west side, downtown, southside. Naturally, you will probably  
see more enforcement where there are more cars and more folk there  
using parking. What generates a lot of ticketing and what people would  
consider the downside would be the street cleaning routes. The street  
cleaning routes are all mainly in the downtown neighborhood areas. They  
generate a lot of tickets. People don't move their cars at times. It is one of  
the most numerous tickets that they issue which may come off appearing  
that it's a targeted areas, but they are posted street cleaning routes. They  
go where the street cleaners go according to that schedule. Meter  
enforcement is the same thing. The meters are where they are and they  
enforce them. They do go citywide and take care of issues all over town,  
especially regarding our dispatch line where people can call in and request  
enforcement where they are having a problem. They field those calls all  
over the city. He stated yes, you are going to see a lot more activity and  
more densely populated areas where there are just more cars and perhaps  
more infractions happening. No specific target per se that they will be  
looking for. They go out there and do their best and solve violations fairly  
and uniquely as they find them.  
Ms. Cynthia Mota stated another question that she has, when people park  
and they get a ticket because they are too close to a corner, what are we  
doing about that. How are you note. Do you need a measuring to find out  
how or can you color. It is kind of difficult for a few people to.  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated that is a good question. There is obviously a  
regulation that they have to follow. Y0ou can't park within 15 feet of a  
corner. There is a method for measuring that. You got to the opposite curb  
and draw a straight line out into the intersection and then it is 15 feet back  
along the curb that you are enforcing. Two or three years ago, at the  
mayor's request, the Parking Authority took on a collaborative effort with the  
Street Department. They got out every summer when the weather is  
appropriate and utilize our event staff to assist with painting curbs.  
Ms. Cynthia Mota stated that she would love to see that happening.  
Mr. Jonathan Haney stated that they have been doing it for the last two or  
three years. Naturally, the event season runs from about October through  
May or June of the following year. They used it as an opportunity to give  
our event staff extra work to help them bridge that gap whenever the events  
are a little bit slower over the summer. He stated that Mark and his crew at  
Public Works have been great working with the Parking Authority. They  
supply them with the paint. He stated that the Parking Authority collaborate  
with them on areas that they would like them to focus on to help get those  
curbs painted. He stated that they got a large part of it done over the past  
couple of years downtown. They can certainly go outside into the  
neighborhoods or wherever and working with them, to tell them where to  
go. They are trying to do what they can do to help out. It helps the Parking  
Authority because it does help them give their staff some extra income in  
down months or otherwise might not have a lot of work around. He agrees  
with them, the Parking Authority can get out there. They've been trying to  
do it and will continue to do that.  
Ms. Candida Affa stated that they have two different issues here and she  
has to agree with Ms. Gerlach. There are some unnecessary meters out  
there. A study would be appropriate. It would be great for them to see a  
study and yet, they need a deterrent for the people that are coming into our  
city and utilizing our spaces for the benefit of just paying $10. These are  
two different issues and believes that the study would be very helpful. She  
still thinks they need to up the fine so they have a deterrent for those who  
are not parking because they don't want to park there. She agrees with  
Ms. Gerlach that they do have unnecessary parking spots. If they could  
address that, that could be great. She stated that she doesn't think that too  
much to do with a deterrent for people parking for five hours and spending  
$10.  
Ms. Ce Ce Gerlach asked the Parking Authority when do they need their  
money by. Therefore, when does Council need to pass this by? Could they  
do that study where they would pass this increase?  
Mr. Jonathon Haney stated that he is not sure how long the study would  
take. Like he mentioned, he does have a preliminary document and would  
be glad to share it with them and take a look at it. Right now, in 2023, the  
Authority had a surplus or at least a contingency fund of about $3.2 million.  
Today, it is about $600,000. He stated that they can see the shortfall there  
with the $1.8 million that Ms. Affa referred to before is there. He stated that  
they kind of need to make a move on this sooner. It doesn't mean that they  
can't engage in some talks and some looks at the meter study while that is  
happening. That would certainly help them to get back on the right track.  
There is a lot of things that go into this as far as facilities. He stated that  
they experienced an earthquake not too long ago. Fortunately, it was very  
shallow for them. It wasn't a tremendous impact, but large concrete and  
rigid structures like parking decks don't tend to act well to earthquakes.  
Have they would have experienced damage, they would not have had the  
reserves in the bank to take care of that. That doesn't mention the ongoing  
maintenance that you have to do to take care of such a large asset that they  
have. The depletion of the reserves really put them in a bad spot. It has  
been a combination of things that came at them and they really need to  
make this move. He understands that Council knows this because he has  
some forward knowledge of what they are looking at or maybe for the  
benefit of the folks that are listening, the increases that they are asking for  
only brings them to the regional aver  
A motion was made by Santo Napoli, seconded by Candida Affa, that this Bill be  
forwarded to the full Council.  
5 - Cynthia Mota, Daryl Hendricks, Ed Zucal, Candida Affa, and Santo Napoli  
2 - Natalie Santos, and Ce-Ce Gerlach  
Yes:  
No:  
ADJOURNED: 6:50 PM